MR. M
1/5
This Shasta D.A. and Redding Police Department can not be trusted , they are" Policing for Profit".
The Supreme Court Just Struck a Huge, Unanimous Blow Against " Policing for Profit"
The Supreme Court struck an extraordinary blow for criminal justice reform on Wednesday, (ruling it to be Unconstitutional) placing real limitations on policing for profit across the country. Its unanimous decision for the first time prohibits all 50 states from imposing excessive fines, including the seizure of property, on people accused or convicted of a crime. Rarely does the court hand down a ruling of such constitutional magnitude—and seldom do all nine justices agree to restrict the power that police and prosecutors exert over individuals. The landmark decision represents a broad agreement on the Supreme Court that law enforcement’s legalized theft has gone too far.
Brady List.
a District Attorney (DA) or Police Department is on the "Brady list," it means that they have a record of officers or prosecutors with a history of dishonesty, misconduct, or credibility issues, which requires them to disclose this information to the defense in a criminal case if any of these individuals are involved in the investigation or prosecution, due to a legal precedent set by the Supreme Court case "Brady v. Maryland.
The term "Brady" comes from the landmark Supreme Court case "Brady v. Maryland," which established the legal requirement that prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence (evidence that could help the defendant) to the defense, including information that could impeach the credibility of a witness like a police officer.
Who can be on the list:
Police officers, prosecutors, and other law enforcement personnel can be placed on the Brady list if they have a history of lying under oath, fabricating evidence, excessive force, or other serious misconduct that could affect their credibility as a witness.
Why it's important:
When a prosecutor is aware that an officer is on the Brady list, they must inform the defense attorney if that officer is involved in a case, allowing the defense to challenge the officer's testimony based on their past misconduct.
International Association of Chiefs of Police
All involved in corruption
1. Police Chief Brady Cops
2.Rpd "Brady Cops "
3."Brady listed" D.A. and Assistant D.A.'s
All of whom are intentionally keeping their records from the public which is a violation of Brady v. Maryland Doctrine, and the Public Records Request Act.
Court Staff/Witness-Whistleblower -Sworn Statement of the DA involvement in abusing her power in a Pattern of "Political Interference" in criminal court cases, to secure wrongful convictions , "Policing for Profit" while politically covering up Redding Dirty Cops conduct. And to Protect the Image Of Shasta from public scrutiny. Protests , Police reforms, Internal Investigations.
Witness Name redacted due to fear of retaliation by DA and " RPD Brady Cops"
Witness name redacted due to safety.
Why the DA does not want the Government involved, and transparency?
-how many innocent people have she falsely imprisoned for crimes they didn't commit?
California enacted a Law making it a Felony For Prosecutorial Misconduct.
New California law signed by Gov makes it a felony for prosecutors to intentionally withhold, alter, or destroy evidence that is favorable to the defendant in a criminal case. This law is codified under California Penal Code Section 141(c).
I highly suggest reforms , and transparency ,
If anyone has been wrongfully charged with a crime they didn't commit , go directly to the "Brady list "website , type in Shasta DA Brady list, for police Type in Redding Police Department Brady list , the whole list of the amount of bad cops they hired is disgusting , and it's a safety risk for citizens in our community to have bad cops doing more harm than they are doing good .including the chief who is on that list too and file a complaint. That goes down the DA and Redding Police . They need to be exposed.
Accountability
